Latest Updates: twitter RSS

  • A Social Network Comprised Entirely of Conversations?

    sull 1:07 PM on August 4, 2010 Permalink | Short Url | Tweet | Reply | Comments RSS

    Category: macroblog | Tags: crazy ideas, , social networking, twitter


    I’ve been wondering what it would be like to have a social network where the only messages were those as part of conversations with other people and not solely one-to-many, that in essence becomes many-to-many on a social network, broadcasts. In other words, a Twitter/Facebook made up of only @reply/discussion threads/streams and nothing else. You would not be able to post unless you are responding to another user.

    Wait. So how would it start? Someone has to say something at some point, unprompted. So, I am envisioning it like this. Either their is the moment of creation…. a message from “god”. No not that God. Ok so god has spoken. Next, everyone else creates accounts and they reply to the god message and reply to others who have replied to the god message. You can quickly see how this would spiral and branch out into some organized chaos. but the point is, everyone is responding to everyone. Their are no blatant messages addressed to nobody specifically. The UI and the system would be designed around this limitation. A Social Network Comprised Entirely of Conversations!

    Would this cut down on the mundane status update message, ads, automated feeds and spam? Some of that just would not fit. But of course a response can be considered these things. Though you would look foolish and be voted down to the point where your messages are muted and eventually account is destroyed.

    But this is absurd. What do we have here? The worlds longest discussion thread? Those used to popup in message boards over the years just for fun. Is that what this proposes then? An official Worlds Longest Discussion Thread?

    Alright maybe then it works like this…. Each day, god posts something new. And that starts it all over again. A daily message from god that unlocks itself to the community for discussion. Then the thread locks up at the end of the day (timezones considered). Yes! Thats the ticket (to heaven)!

    Ok taking that concept further. Scratch the idea of the god message. Well, maybe the very first message is by god but then everyday, every user is allowed to post a single message that is not in response to another user. This is their own god message that creates their own daily thread. Maybe nobody responds. Maybe a million people respond inside it (stemmed from your initial message). Either way, you as a user still get to see everyone elses (or just your friends) god messages and can respond in those threads.

    So why have I even entertained this concept? Because Twitter kind of sucks. I mean it’s cool. I love it :-) and have tweeted over 4,000 times in 2+ years. I’m glad Twitter exists. But the thing is… Most of the 20 BILLION TWEETS are not part of real conversations. It is spam or imported feeds or mundane things that though cute and all… just dont add much to the fundamental ideas of discourse. Facebook is a little better, or different at least, in this regard. But the same problems exist. And always will. but that is why their is room for some ridiculous experimentation like what I have proposed here.

    It’s time to end the absurdity that is this blog post.
    Carry on.

    @sull

     
  • A Comment to “Imaginationland” on Andy’s Blog Regarding 140limit on Twitter

    sull 10:03 PM on March 24, 2010 Permalink | Short Url | Tweet | Reply | Comments RSS

    Category: sull comments | Tags: 140limit, microblogging, social messaging, twitter,


    A comment to this post:
    Imaginationland
    http://jarodrussell.livejournal.com/1449722.html

    it should be obvious why 140 is the limit but the real question is why is it STILL the limit for ALL tweets? A magority of twitter users are using computers and either the website or a client app to tweet…. or if a mobile device, more and more are using phones with data plans that are able to do email and transfer files and browse the web etc etc. Within 2 years, most people with have “smart phones” and SMS will not be used for social messaging. Though SMS will always have a place and be useful, it certainly is not and will not be the sole technology for social messaging. That time has come and passed.

    So though Winer may have phrased things awkwardly, the question is valid. Why limit people to 140 characters today? Why not have a logical interface that once 140 characters is reached, a little note appears that sais the message is no longer SMS compatible, do you want to continue? That’s literally all that is needed to appease all users. Most dont know what SMS is or care about it when they are using Twitter. It is 2010, not 2006.

    With that said, maybe their still is some intrinsic value in the limitation. For a while I enjoyed it myself. Of late, the novelty has worn off. When i have more to say, i dont want to feel like i am nosiy or spammy by having several successive tweets to finish my thinking. I need to go long sometimes. Why can’t i just do it in one post using just Twitter? I think the time has come to examine the limitation and I think Twitter will eventually follow Facebook and Buzz etc by allowing larger posts and having SMS compatible posts as an optional feature that is seamlessly integrated into the user experience.

    @sull

     
  • louisgray.com: It’s Twitter’s World: The Second, Parallel, Internet

    sull 10:37 PM on October 4, 2009 Permalink | Short Url | Tweet | Reply | Comments RSS

    Category: links | Tags: twitter


    Well written. Truth be told. Though I think Twitter is vulnerbale to being the next friendster.

     
  • Lunch’s Twitter List: Recommendations With Rationale – ReadWriteStart

    sull 5:22 PM on September 30, 2009 Permalink | Short Url | Tweet | Reply | Comments RSS

    Category: links | Tags: , twitter


    This is good stuff to supplement the Twitter SUL. also not my idea on http://twitter.com/openSUL

     
  • Twitter and Facebook Investment Terms and Game Plans – ReadWriteStart

    sull 11:20 PM on September 28, 2009 Permalink | Short Url | Tweet | Reply | Comments RSS

    Category: links | Tags: acquisitions, , investments, ipo, twitter, valuation


    Nice article. I agree with Greg Boutin.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel